It’s a thing we often say about composers and politicians;
“They were the wrong person at the wrong time”.
We say it about Purcell, whose genius for opera was several decades too
early for English tastes. We say it of Churchill, whose pre- and post-war
political views were completely alien to the mass of the people. I wonder if you could say that about me?
Egotistical as I am (I argue that to be a successful
musician you have to be egotistical, so I make no apologies) as I grow older I
look back not on missed opportunities but on opportunities which would have
suited me perfectly had I just been born 50 years earlier. I write not as an old crony who always bemoans
the disappearance of the “good old days”, but of someone who made career and
life choices which became redundant almost as soon as I made them.
The two burning childhood ambitions I had were to be a
bus driver and to be a cathedral organist.
Where the former came from, I don’t know, but from the age of 8, whenever
a school holiday would come, my parents would send me off with a half crown in
my pocket to buy a Red Rover, with which I could spend the day travelling the
length and breadth of London on the red buses which dominated the streets (and
still dominate, albeit with lots of garish decorations to celebrate their
privatised status). Along with my friend
Peter Almond, we covered every London bus route and visited every nook and
cranny of a city which was then busily rebuilding itself from the shattered
ruins left in the wake of the Second World War.
I remember coming home one day and when my father asked where I had
been, he seemed surprised that we had toured around the east end and the docks,
around Shoreditch, Whitechapel and Stratford; not because he felt I had been in
any danger (which I most certainly was, but being unaware of it, it never
crossed my mind to think of it), but because he hadn’t been there since the war
and wondered whether anything was left.
I was able to tell him that the red RLH route (a great rarity) numbered
178 (I think), toured the deserted slums, the bomb-damaged warehouses and
street after street of burnt out houses, and in its entire journey, never
picked up another passenger – simply, nobody lived there, and nobody in their
right mind went to that crime-ridden, sleaze-pot wasteland of abandoned industry.
If I had achieved one of my burning ambitions at 24, I
had achieved the other three years earlier when I got my licence enabling me to
drive a manual transmission single decker of 12 meters length or more. That I took my test on a single decked bus
with a three speed crash gearbox did not exactly hinder me, but I needed the
double decker licence as well, so a short spell with Cardiff City Transport got
that sorted, and by my 22nd birthday I was a fully-fledged bus and
coach driver.
Other ambitions came along and were all achieved
remarkably early. My desire to get into
journalism and broadcasting was only made stronger after a disastrous interview
with Robert Ponsonby, into which I was pushed by my university professor anxious
to get sympathetic people into the BBC to help promote his music. Again, the die was cast, and by a stroke of
good fortune, my work as a music critic at the daily Western Mail opened up no end of doors with the Fleet Street press. Being one of the few non-military English
voices in Derry at the height of the “troubles” meant that the BBC snapped me
up, first for daily arts programmes and then for more newsy stuff when an Irish
accent would have immediately betrayed me as being on one side or the other
(the English were universally hated, so we were seen as unreliable by both but,
curiously, acceptable to both – they shared a mutual hatred of
us which meant they would talk more freely in our presence).
A desire to be an ABRSM examiner was realized two years earlier than the then permitted minimum age for examiners, due to the fact that Herbert
Howells, on the appointments committee, was so fascinated by my coach driving
(his father had been a coachbody builder) that our entire interview was given
over to coaches, not a word about music, and at the end of it, he told the rest
of the panel that they had to appoint me because he and I had so much still to
talk about (which, sadly, we never did).
I loved my 18 years with ABRSM (and 16 more with Trinity), but I became
disillusioned with both, as pressures to meet commercial objectives overran, as
I saw it, both educational and musical ones.
The musical education of tens of thousands of young children were
sacrificed on the altar of new ideas on business management, and I couldn’t
live with that. But I made dozens of
wonderful friends, and visited dozens of marvellous countries, and to this day
I still wake up in the night wishing I was about to head off for a day’s
examining. The lovely thing about it was
that you never knew what you were going to hear, and in 100 performances of Petzold’s
Minuet in G you would have at least
half as many extraordinary re-interpretations and convoluted readings of the
score; there really never was a dull moment examining.
But I was born in an age when the ABRSM was seen as
the ultimate arbiter of musical ability; where the examiner’s word was final
and where honest opinion was valued over mealy mouthed platitudes. We may live in a kinder age, but we don’t
live in a more honest one. That conflict
between the pressures of office-staff with a remit to ensure the machinery of
exams run smoothly in accordance with high-flying business gurus brought in at
great expense to streamline a perfectly serviceable operation, and the examiner
determined to maintain clear and definite musical standards is something which
came in the wake of Thatcherism, Reaganism and the computers; I wished I had
not been around to witness it.
The excitement of seeing my name in print, of hearing
my voice on the radio and of being listened to and read by thousands around the
world made me determined to maintain an honest and clear-headed set of
attitudes in my print and radio journalism.
If I felt the Irish hunger-strikers in the 1980s were committing acts
against the teachings of the church, which was actively encouraging them, I
said it loud and clear. If I sincerely thought
that Arvo Pārt and John Rutter were frauds, I wrote it, always
sure to support it with carefully chosen opposing views; regretting the first
ever since and facing a threat of legal action from the second. My editors checked my copy, sometimes
questioned it, sometimes demanded its change, but once through, always backing
me to the hilt. But it began to change
20 years or so ago when the editor was removed from the equation, and with it
the need to be honest and fair. Now,
editor-less rantings and ravings in blogs and online chatrooms have taken over
from reasoned and coherently argued discussion.
I wish I had disappeared from the scene before we lost the editors and
allowed the opinionated bigots free rein on our media platforms.
Just as I was looking forward to another ten years’
happy bus driving in Scotland, the autonomous bus has arrived and my skill as a
driver, honed over hours, days, months, years of careful training, is rapidly
being replaced by a pre-programmed computer.
It makes things safer, I know, and is better all round for us: I just
wish it hadn’t happened on my watch.
And then we come to the organ. Last night I managed to avoid a concert given
on a thing called an “electone”.
Apparently it is a digitalised machine with a couple of half keyboards
and a row of stick like things which masquerade as pedals, from which, through
the marvels of audio sampling, sounds can be coaxed which mimic and imitate
those of other instruments. A parasite,
if ever there was one, feeding off the life blood of sincere, hard-working musicians
and instrument makers in the headlong dash to achieve technological credibility
at minimum effort. Held in Asia’s
premier music conservatory (a bit like holding a black mass in St Peter’s Rome)
it apparently attracted a full house.
The programme even had the effrontery to include two pieces of organ
music, one by Rheinberger described as “beautiful” (Rheinberger = dreary
aimlessness), the other by Jehan Alain described as “beautiful” (Alain = pained
and emotionally intense). On top of that
were orchestral transcriptions and just one original piece for “electone”. Students
flock to learn his travesty of musical-type noise, and swoon and twitter over
the remarkable way it sounds like a “real orchestra”. And so they should. Why bother with learning fingering, bowing, breath
control, articulation, paradiddles, flams, and the like when you can just sit
smiling at a computer and let it do most of the work for you?
To me it’s the last straw. Once upon a time the organ was king. Bach thought so, Mozart thought so, Beethoven
thought so, Brahms thought so, Schumann thought so, Messiaen thought so… It’s
not my place to disagree with them, but I’m in the wrong place at the wrong
time: convenience and ease matter more than artistry and conscience, and the
end is surely nigh for the organ. We
don’t have any students wanting to learn it in the conservatory, and public
recitals, once the musical mainstay of society, are fading out of
consciousness.
But the rot set in a long time ago. My first main teacher had been a pupil of
Thurston Dart, one of the pioneers of the so-called “Authentic Instrument”
movement. The organs of my youth were
all being modelled on the “Baroque Tricks” expounded by Ralph Downes. We learnt to avoid legato tone like the plague and to pedal just with our toes. Orchestral and operatic transcriptions, once
the mainstay of any organ recital, were out in that climate of musical purity
and authenticity. I rebelled against
that, as did others, and from a few well-chosen teachers began to unbend the
Holy Of Holies approach to “Baroque Tricks” and see the organ as a means for communication
rather more than the ascetic mechanics of 18th century obsequies to
music.
And then, lo and behold, we learn that Dart and Downes
got it wrong, and that they took an extreme view which was not supported by
adequate evidence. I loved playing Bach
in Novello editions with swell pedals, big crescendi
and huge rallentandi. It was not “authentic” to the 18th
century, but it was authentic to the 20th, with our love of big
sounds and richly expressive music. I
loved being an organist then. I learnt skills
in programme planning and registration which ensured I could entertain an
audience with good quality original music, well played (I hope) and ideally
tailored to suit the needs of instrument and audience. Serious and fun went hand in hand, although I
have to say the serious was great fun for me as well!
All through my idyllic youth, however, there was an invidious
sub-culture around; the Hammond Organ.
Identical in every respect to the “electone” except that it made a
hideous sound which was unique rather than derivative. Because it was called an Organ, it was
assumed that it was the latest technological improvement on the pipe organ –
easy sounds at a fraction of the cost, and who cares that those sounds are so
vile? Nobody promoted the Hammond Organ
better than Monty Python, who moved from unconnected scene to unconnected scene
by a back view of a naked man playing the Hammond Organ and turning to the
camera saying “and now for something completely different”. It became almost a catchphrase with organ recitalists
(the phrase, not the nudity) and the seriousness at the core of the instrument
was compromised.

Meanwhile, players of pipe organs have gone back to
the “Baroque Tricks” of Downes, but this time gone even further. Now we don’t just want the organ to sound
like an 18th century one, but look like one too. Stops (those vital tools for manipulating the
various sounds) are placed so out of the way that whole armies of people are
called on to push them out and pull them in, tuning systems are brought out of
museums so that the organ not only cannot be played with an orchestra but cannot
be used with a choir. No wonder we flock
to the “electone” – at least it sounds nice, which is one up on most pipe
organs today. Today’s organists are
serious, stiff and boring; you can’t imagine them having fun.
So here I am. Irrelevant
to the organ world until fashions change and for a fleeting moment my style of
playing comes back into vogue, irrelevant to the bus driving world until such
time as an autonomous bus does a Boeing 737max and forces everyone on board to
die when the technology drives it over a cliff edge, irrelevant to a world
where considered and honest views are drowned out by the noise of ill-considered
bigotry, and wondering whether music is a commodity to be weighed in dollars
and cents or emotions and intellect.
Of course, there is one bright spot. No editor in the world would permit me to
write this self-indulgent, unbalanced rubbish without heavy editing and
excisions. I can, at least, embrace the
brave New World by being yet another bigoted egotist assuming there is an
audience for my pointless and rambling prose.
Well I enjoyed reading it. But then I also enjoyed the CD of Bielby playing Lefebure-Wely.
ReplyDelete